Government: Journalists are not Comfortable with Government Involvement
Government: Journalists are not Comfortable with Government Involvement
Press freedom goes hand-in-hand with democracy. If journalism is to help the public participate in civic debate, journalists need to report without government intrusion. This includes reporting on the government itself, often referred to as the “watchdog role.” At the same time, governments can and often do help protect the freedom and independence of the news media both in judicial cases and provide financial support. There exists a significant tension, then, in news media reliance on the body of government that upholds its freedom.
Successful management of that tension relies on the government’s foundational belief in the importance of an independent news media — even if it does not always serve their interests.
Unfortunately, belief in that fundamental value has shown increasing signs of erosion. Government interference in the news is on the rise worldwide, with even well-intentioned laws sometimes weaponized against journalists. In 2024 alone, governments have spied on journalists, imprisoned them and even failed to hold their killers accountable. But 2024 also saw the passage of the EU’s European Media Freedom Act, a law that seeks to protect media independence and the right to information.
This survey explored journalists’ general views on the role of governments in the news media dynamics. Our international pool of respondents included journalists from three types of regimes:
- Liberal democracies have free and fair elections, free and independent media, clear checks and balances on power, rule of law, and civil liberties.
- Electoral democracies have free and fair elections and largely free media but may lack some of the three latter protections.
- Autocracies largely lack freedom of expression, including media freedom.
We wanted to understand how journalists feel about the relationship between the press and the government — both overall and within each regime type.
The findings reveal that few journalists anywhere (9%) see positive impacts of government intervention. About half (54%) see negative impacts from government involvement, although journalists in liberal democracies (25%) are less likely to see negative impacts than journalists in other types of regimes (67-70%). Half of journalists surveyed have experienced some form of government overreach in the last year. Once again, journalists in liberal democracies (29%) are much less likely than journalists elsewhere (56-66%) to note such experiences. And across regime types, journalists are uncomfortable with governmental attempts to define the boundaries of either the profession or its practitioners.
Why we did this study
This project continues CNTI’s Defining News Initiative seeking to understand how journalism is defined today. Access to information is not just important for its own sake; it makes democracy possible. In 2024, the United Nations outlined Global Principles for Information Integrity in response to growing challenges around misinformation, disinformation and hate speech.
This survey explores (1) how current journalists view their industry, (2) their (and their organizations’) uses and perceptions of technology, (3) their perspectives on government action and cyber security and (4) their experiences with online harassment and abuse. Importantly, respondents to CNTI’s study come from a global mix of journalists that provide an international perspective on how journalists are navigating and understanding their rapidly changing industry.
For more details, see “About this study.”
How we did this
CNTI partnered with journalism organizations in several continents to share the survey with their memberships. Surveys are a snapshot of what people think at a particular moment in time. These data were collected between October 14, 2024 and November 24, 2024, which means they highlight the perspective of journalists around the world during that time frame.
These data reflect the responses collected from 433 journalists across 63 countries. Because no global census of journalists exists, no survey can be “fully representative” of all journalists. Moreover, 256 of our respondents (59%) came from three countries: Mexico, Nigeria, and the U.S.; when one of these three countries is statistically different from others in its group, we acknowledge that difference in the text.
For this section, we grouped countries by their political regime. Liberal democracies tend to have greater protections for freedom of expression than electoral democracies, and both have greater protections than autocracies. Of our survey respondents, 27% live in an autocratic country, 35% live in a liberal democracy and 39% live in an electoral democracy.
Relationships with the government are getting attention, especially in autocracies
In a question about how news organizations prioritize seven issues of concern, relationships with the government falls right in the middle. About one third (30%) of the journalists who took our survey say that relationships with the government are getting a great deal of attention at their news organizations, and another third (33%) say they are getting a fair amount of attention.
How much attention is given to relationships with the government differs when broken down by regime type.1 In general, the less democratic the country, the more journalists say that these relations are getting a great deal of attention. Journalists working in autocracies and electoral democracies are about twice as likely as those living in liberal democracies to say that their organizations are paying a great deal of attention to relationships with the government.
Few journalists see positive impacts of government
Across regime types, about one-in-ten journalists say the government in their country offers important support for journalism.
All the same, journalists in liberal democracies are less concerned about government involvement than those in the other regime types. Strong majorities (67-70%) of surveyed journalists in electoral democracies and autocracies say the government seeks to have too much control over their journalism, while journalists in liberal democracies mostly (62%) do not feel much government involvement either way.
Many journalists are directly experiencing government overreach
For many of the journalists who took our survey, concerns about government control are borne out by direct experience, a finding that tracks with other data indicating government interference is on the rise worldwide.
Roughly a third (34%) of respondents say they have received direct complaints from their government within the past year, and about as many (29%) say they have been denied access to official events, hampering their ability to report. About two-in-ten (21%) have experienced direct government censorship, while 5% said they have experienced the most extreme level of control we asked about: detention or imprisonment. All told, half of journalists answering these questions experienced at least one of these. Less than one-in-three (29%) journalists in liberal democracies reported government intrusion, while a majority (56-66%) of those in other regime types did.
In keeping with the levels of concern described above, there are big differences by regime type for all of these issues.
Journalists do not want government to define the profession or its practitioners
Policies that impact journalism, whether seeking to support it or seeking to constrain it, need to define who and what they cover. Even well-intended laws that define journalism or journalists can — and have been — used to empower governments that seek to control or censor the press. For example, in Egypt and India, permitting laws have been used to suppress reporting that is critical of the government, especially by foreign reporters.
Strong majorities of journalists — at least three-in-four — are against the government's involvement in defining either journalism or journalists. This is the case across regions and regime types.
Continue reading:
- Overview
- Definitions: Journalists easily articulate their distinct role in society but do not think the public can
- Technology: Journalists believe technology is improving their work, but they are less sure about AI
- Security: One-in-three journalists regularly face serious risks, but their level of preparedness varies; most want to talk about it
- About this study
Read CNTI’s companion report based on surveys with representative publics in four countries.
- In this section, we use regime type rather than region as our main form of geographical distinction because it is more relevant to the questions we asked. See "About this study" for more about why. ↩︎
What It Means to Do Journalism in the Age of AI
Share
Continue Reading
-
If, When and How to Communicate Journalistic Uses of AI to the Public
Conclusions of a Day-Long Discussion among Global Cross-Industry Experts
-
Focus Group Insights #3: In a Digital World, Getting the News Requires More Work, Not Less
Defining News Initiative
-
Enabling a Sustainable News Environment: A Framework for Media Finance Legislation
An analysis of 23 policies affecting over 30 countries